ノアの箱舟を創ろう Let us Create the Super Ocean-Floating-Structures such as the Noah's ark.

ノアの箱舟を創ろう Let us Create the Super Ocean - Floating - Structures such as the Noah's ark.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

U.S. Finds Most Oil From Spill Poses Little Additional Risk:The New York Times

【出展リンク】:




U.S. Finds Most Oil From Spill Poses Little Additional Risk


Jeff Haller for The New York Times
Nearly 36,000 tons of oily debris had been collected from shorelines through Sunday. Above, near the shore in Port Fourchon, La.



WASHINGTON — The government is expected to announce on Wednesday that three-quarters of the oil from the Deepwater Horizon leak has already evaporated, dispersed, been captured or otherwise eliminated — and that much of the rest is so diluted that it does not seem to pose much additional risk of harm.

Readers' Comments

Share your thoughts.
A government report finds that about 26 percent of the oil released from BP’s runaway well is still in the water or onshore in a form that could, in principle, cause new problems. But most is light sheen at the ocean surface or in a dispersed form below the surface, and federal scientists believe that it is breaking down rapidly in both places.
On Tuesday, BP began pumping drilling mud into the well in an attempt to seal it for good. Since the flow of oil was stopped with a cap on July 15, people on the Gulf Coast have been wondering if another shoe was going to drop — a huge underwater glob of oil emerging to damage more shorelines, for instance.
Assuming that the government’s calculations stand scrutiny, that looks increasingly unlikely. “There’s absolutely no evidence that there’s any significant concentration of oil that’s out there that we haven’t accounted for,” said Jane Lubchenco, head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the lead agency in producing the new report.
She emphasized, however, that the government remained concerned about the ecological damage that has already occurred and the potential for more, and said it would continue monitoring the gulf.
“I think we don’t know yet the full impact of this spill on the ecosystem or the people of the gulf,” Dr. Lubchenco said.
Among the biggest unanswered questions, she said, is how much damage the oil has done to the eggs and larvae of organisms like fish, crabs and shrimp. That may not become clear for a year or longer, as new generations of those creatures come to maturity.
Thousands of birds and other animals are known to have been damaged or killed by the spill, a relatively modest toll given the scale of some other oil disasters that killed millions of animals. Efforts are still under way in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida to clean up more than 600 miles of oiled shoreline. The government and BP collected 35,818 tons of oily debris from shorelines through Sunday.
It remains to be seen whether subtle, long-lasting environmental damage from the spill will be found, as has been the case after other large oil spills.
The report, which is to be unveiled on Wednesday morning, is a result of an extensive effort by federal scientists, with outside help, to add up the total volume of oil released and to figure out where it went.
The lead agency behind the report, the oceanic and atmospheric administration, played down the size of the spill in the early days, and the Obama administration was ultimately forced to appoint a scientific panel that came up with far higher estimates of the flow rate from the well. Whether the new report will withstand critical scrutiny is uncertain; advocacy groups and most outside scientists had not learned of it on Tuesday.
The government announced early this week that the total oil release, from the time the Deepwater Horizon exploded on April 20 until the well was effectively capped, was 4.9 million barrels, plus or minus 10 percent. That estimate makes the Deepwater Horizon disaster the largest marine spill in history. It is surpassed on land by a 1910 spill in the California desert.
As the scientists did their calculations, they were able to rely on direct measurements of the fate of some of the oil that spewed from the broken well. For example, BP and its contractors succeeded in capturing about 17 percent of it with various containment mechanisms, the report says.
The outcome for much of the oil could not be directly measured, but had to be estimated using protocols that were scrutinized by scientists inside and outside the government, Dr. Lubchenco said.
The report calculates, for example, that about 25 percent of the chemicals in the oil evaporated at the surface or dissolved into seawater in the same way that sugar dissolves in tea. (The government appears to have settled on a conservative number for that estimate, with the scientific literature saying that as much as 40 percent of the oil from a spill can disappear in this way.)

Clifford Krauss contributed reporting from Houston, and Campbell Robertson from New Orleans.










私の白昼夢 再考 :グローバル実業家集団ロックフェラー一族の根底にある想念は一体どのよう

【出展リンク】:

http://ameblo.jp/global7ocean/entry-10609651065.html


世界の政治・経済・情報・人脈・資本・産業・報道機関等を支配・管理するほどの国境なき活動で、世界に大きな影響を誇示するグローバル実業家集団一族の根底にある想念は一体どのような歴史的な背景から生じてきているのだろうか?????


この設問に対しての解答は、簡単に求められるわけではない。


古代ユダヤ王国の歴史が、神話的な伝説として、世界の各地に広がって生きてきた多くのユダヤ民族によって、絶えることがなく、現代まで、引き継がれ語り続けられてきている。


ユダヤ民族の世界各地への流浪の始まりが、旧約聖書の中には、語られている。




古代エジプトの王朝の中で、多くのユダヤ民族が奴隷として蔑まれ使役されていたのである。

様々なユダヤ民族の指導者達の伝説・説話・歴史的な物語のように、語り続けられて現在の世界に、伝えられて残されてきたものが、旧約聖書であり、その中に残され記されて数千年に渡って伝えられているのである。


その中には、人類世界の未来を預言するような記述も、ユダヤ民族の聖なる言葉の書として、扱われている。


古代エジプトの王朝の中で、その絶対的権力の誇示としてのピラミッドの建設のために、多くのユダヤ民族が奴隷として使役されていた人間達の社会史的な歴史上の伝説なのである。


これらの物語の根底にあるのは、民族として、虐げられ奈落のような生活状態を生き残るべき術として、そのような宿命的な逆境状態から、どのように、きりぬけていったのであるのかについての先祖達が経験したことを教訓として、たどることであるように思える。


耐えることを遥かに超えた人々の奴隷状態の抑圧された困窮な生活状況から、如何にして、しのぎ、生き残ることに希望を託したのであるのか。


これらについて、我々の人類の先達たちの人々は、その時代の絶大な支配権力者に抑圧されながらも、反抗・抵抗をしながら、どのような思いで、生活したのであろうか。 


彼ら民族共同的な指導者が、熟考し、失敗を重ねながらも、綿密な計画をたて、どのような手順で、実行したのかについてを考察することも、意義深いことである。


古代エジプトにおいて、絶対的な支配者に、抵抗して生まれた人々の集合的共同運命体が、いわゆるユダヤ民族としての起源なのであろう。


ユダヤ民族の起源においては、単なる帰属的な種族を意味するものではないのであろう。


世界の人類の4大分明の発祥地の一つである古代エジプトにおいて、旧約聖書の中で語られているユダヤ民族の言い伝えが、現代に生きるユダヤ人においても、旧約聖書を通して、先祖達が経験した聖なる言い伝えとしての物語を自らの生き方としての教訓・訓示・啓示として、人生の歩み方や思考・想念・判断に大きな影響を与えているのであろう。


この民族の歴史物語をユダヤ民族の宝のように大事にして、世界各地に、流浪しながらも、生活の糧や基本にして、生存してきたのであろう。


民族の起源を聖なる書物として後世に伝え、子々孫々へ、引き継がれ、大事にして継続してきたからこそ、世界各地に流浪した民族の拠り所として、その訓話的な想念の文化を共有・共感することが可能となっており、哲学的・想念的な民族としての共同・協力・団結心等が生み出されてくるのであろう。


この旧約聖書は、ユダヤ民族の誇りであり宝なのである。 かつユダヤ民族の先祖からの貴い遺書なのであろう。


聖書の物語の真偽は別として、その聖書の物語は、今後とも、人類の歴史の中で、新らしいページが聖なるユダヤの人によって、付け加えられて、後世に伝えられていくことであろう。


そのユダヤ民族の歴史の流れ中で、世界的な活動・支配を成し遂げてきたユダヤ民族の旗頭の一員であるロックフェラー一族は、今後の世界の大きな時代変遷の中において、統括的な権力支配者として、世界に君臨し、存在・存続・継続し、続けていくことは、困難なことであろう。


なぜならば、それを例えるならば、人類の歴史の変遷における物理的なエントロピー的な拡散の原則を押しのけて、集中的な集積という過程に進むということは、そこに莫大なエネルギーを必要とされるがゆえにおいて、また物理の経時の過程が、拡散の過程に進むという物理熱力学の法則が存在しているがゆえなのである。


現世に言い伝えられて残されてきた聖書の記述やその解釈・編纂も、物理的な拡散の過程による経年の過程での分散的な流れの中で、様々に変化せざるを得ないことなのである。


例えとして、人類の知恵と力をある種の理想的な社会的想念や論理に集結させることが可能であったとしても、また、その管理・運営過程のすべてについて、そのような機構を維持できるような絶大な権力を構築し、維持・管理を企てたとしても、総合統括司令塔のような統括機能を維持して、その管理機構を経年的に変化させずに運営させていくことの果てしのない無限の工程を実現させていくことは、この現実の人類社会の中に存在する多様性のある情念の世界をも含めて管理することの実現性およびその可能性は殆どないことになるであろう。


人類の生存の存在のその根底には、遺伝子に組み込まれた生物の生命の本源の中に情念・条理を所有している。 


そこには各自各位が、個別的独立(Independance)して、存在して、個々に内有されているものである。




それこそ、天地を司る神の持つ力によって可能であっったとしても、多様性のある世界の民族・民衆の意思を分断ではなく、統合・統一することは、非常に困難な過程を進む事を意味しており、その実現可能性は殆どないことであろう。


楽観的な理想論では、超えることのできない生物種の生存の宿命がこの先に大きく待ち構えていることが判明するのである。


今後において、中国においての,秦の始皇帝の末裔である中国民族のある種の帝国主義国家の台頭に対して、どのように、このユダヤ的な思想で、ユダヤ民族と呼ばれている人びとは、どのように対抗していくことになるのであろうか?


現在の世界の状況は、その大きな勢力である米国および立ち上がる龍のごとき新興の中国との国際関係の力学によって、生じた新しい舞台劇が開始されてきたのである。


無神論を基本として成立している中国共産主義思想と有神論で構成された自由主義リベラルの西洋思想の並存する現代社会の未来はどのような展開がなされることになるのであろうか。


人類の民族の興亡の歴史においては、絶え間ない生存競争・闘争と平和・協調の間の大きな揺り動きの変動の中で、浮き沈みを繰り返し経ながら変遷していくことになるのでであろうか。


日本を始め、世界の先進的な諸国は、その自己保全的・拡張侵略主義的な安易な考えによって、世界の安定・秩序を脅かすような殖民帝国主義的な覇権的な競争と表面上の協調・共同主義で、国際関係を形成しようとしている。


世界の秩序を破壊して、限度を超える大きな影響を及ぼすであろう中国の覇権帝国主義的共産主義やイスラエルにおけるユダヤ的な正義という名を偽るイスラエルの侵略的な殖民主義・シオニズム・宗教教条原理主義、日本や米国、西洋諸国における資本的強者による帝国主義には賛同できない。


このいずれも排他的な自己保全的思想や既成既得権力支配者の論理で形成されているのである。


民族・人類の可能性を追求する歴史の過程で、人々が安心して暮らせないがために、流浪すべき状況の出現を防ぐ方法として、律法に規範を置く国家という共同運命体を形成・構築しながら、また生活の規範・道徳としての神と言う概念が私達の先祖達の知恵の中で、創られ生まれ、育てられてきたのであろう。


人類の未来において、人類社会を秩序安定させて、統括支配・管理する神は存在するのか、あるいは存在しないのかの神学論や神の如くのような絶対的な支配権力を求める者の論理・思想は、これからも探求されつづけられていくことになるであろう。




希望は逆境・絶望の状況を経験したことのあるものにだけ、その輝くような存在の価値があるようである。 そこにこそ、叱咤激励の自己への啓発と不断の努力が生みだされてくるのである。


社会で、成功する人は、このような逆境の状態を乗り越えてきているのである。


安穏で、安逸な生活の行き着くところは、やがては、絶望の暗闇が待ち構えているのである。


民族、国家の興亡においても、このような原理・原則が厳然と存在しているのである。


未来の社会においても、そこに、永遠的に確実に継続されて存在するであろうものは、【未来への希望】と【対立関係ではない信頼関係によって形成され共有された共同・協同】といわれる人類社会や宇宙法則に共通に存在している調和・秩序・安定を求めて変動する物理力学的概念的な想念・イデアなのである。


混沌・破壊のブラックホールは、我々の世界から、遥かに遠い別次元の事象の現象なのである。


私達は、夜空に浮かぶ個々なる無数の星達で形成された宇宙の秩序と一体なのである。




我々の先達が、夜空の星に未来への夢と希望を託したような素朴で謙虚な存在であり続けたいものである。

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Methods That Have Been Tried to Stop the Leaking Oil : The New York Times

【出展リンク】:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/05/25/us/20100525-topkill-diagram.html?ref=us


Methods That Have Been Tried to Stop the Leaking Oil




Efforts to Suppress the Flow of Oil

Since a fire engulfed the Deepwater horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, engineers have attempted a number of techniques to slow or stop the torrent of oil leaking from the wellhead 5,000 feet below the surface.

JULY 30TAKING IT FROM THE TOP, AGAIN

BP is expected to begin the process of sealing the Macondo well with the “static kill” as early as Monday. The method is similar to the top kill that failed in early June and would use existing equipment and plumbing. But this time, engineers can pump mud slower and at lower pressure because a new cap atop the well had stemmed the flow of oil. After the static kill, BP will proceed with killing the well from the bottom with the relief well.
Source: BP

JULY 14TESTING TO SEE IF THE WELL IS INTACT

With the new sealing cap in place, engineers will test the well’s pressure to determine its integrity.
Source: BP

JULY 10A BETTER CAP

In a procedure that would take several days, BP removed the well cap that was put in place on June 3 to replace it with a new one with the potential to completely stop the flow from the well. The new cap has some of the same types of components as the blowout preventer. Once installed, engineers will take pressure readings for up to two days. If the pressure is at an anticipated level, the cap could remain closed, ending the gusher.
Source: BP

MID-JULYADDING MORE CAPACITY

By mid-July, BP expects to have a total of four vessels on site to collect and process oil and gas. The Q4000 will be replaced by another vessel, Toisa Pisces, which will be connected to one of two floating risers that can be disconnected in the event of a hurricane.
Source: BP

JUNE 16CAPTURING MORE OIL

A second containment system has begun siphoning oil and gas from the leaking well. BP estimates the system will carry 5,000 to 10,000 barrels a day to the surface, supplementing the roughly 15,000 barrels collected daily by a containment cap on top of the blowout preventer.
Using equipment originally put in place to inject heavy drilling mud during the failed “top kill” procedure last month, the new system extracts oil and gas directly from the blowout preventer, passes it through a manifold on the seafloor and pipes it up to the Q4000 surface vessel.
The Q4000 has no storage capacity and will burn the oil and gas.
Source: BP

JUNE 4BEGINNING TO CAPTURE SOME OIL

A cap placed over the upper portion of the leaking well was funneling some oil and gas to a surface ship, though oil continued to billow from under the lip and through four open vents on top of the device. Methanol is being pumped into the cap to prevent the formation of icy hydrates that could block the mile-long pipe rising from the cap. Engineers hope to capture more oil by progressively closing the cap vents.
Source: BP

MAY 31ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO CAP THE WELL

After the failure of the top kill operation, BP began a new operation to cap the well. The damaged pipe will be cut from the blowout preventer, and a dome will be lowered over it to catch the spewing oil.
The new riser pipe will have a 6.625 inch internal pipe to capture leaking oil and gas. Methanol and warm seawater will be pumped down the riser to insulate the smaller pipe and prevent the formation of ice crystals which caused the earlier containment dome to fail.
Source: BP

MAY 26THE TOP KILL AND JUNK SHOT

BP tried two more operations, called the “junk shot” and the “top kill,” to stop the gushing oil. In the “top kill,” heavy drilling liquid is pumped into the well until the weight of the liquid overcomes the pressure of the rising oil. The “junk shot” involves injecting objects like golf balls to clog the blowout preventer, the stack of valves at the top of the well.
Source: BP technical briefings

MAY 16ATTACHING A TUBE

After several unsuccessful attempts, BP inserted a mile-long tube into the broken riser pipe to divert some of the oil to a drill ship on the surface some 5,000 feet above the wellhead. The tube siphoned off about 22,000 barrels of oil over nine days, but was shut off once the “top kill” operation began.

MAY 7LOWERING A CONTAINMENT DOME

BP constructed a four-story containment dome, intended to control the largest of the leaks. As the dome was lowered, crews discovered that the opening was becoming clogged by an icy mix of gas and water. The dome was set down on the seabed, 650 feet away from the leak, as officials decided how to proceed.
Source: BP

MAY 2DRILLING RELIEF WELLS

BP is drilling relief wells that may be used to plug its runaway well in the Gulf of Mexico. Once one of the new wells intersects the existing well, heavy drilling mud, followed by cement, will be used to stop the oil from leaking.
Source: BP

APRIL 30CHEMICAL DISPERSANTS

BP officials began injecting chemical dispersants underwater, near the source of the leaks. The dispersants, usually used on the water surface, is intended to break up the oil before it rises. The full environmental impact of the technique is unknown, but the E.P.A. has directed BP to change to a less toxic chemical than it had originally chosen.
Source: BP

APRIL 25REPAIRING THE BLOWOUT PREVENTER

The quickest way to stop the leak would have been to activate the well’s blowout preventer, a valve designed to seal off the well in an emergency. But several efforts to activate the blowout preventer failed.
Sources: United States Coast Guard; BP

How the Leak Started

Fire
Gerald Herbert/Associated Press
On April 20, the Deepwater Horizon, a drilling rig 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana in the Gulf of Mexico, exploded into flames. Two days later the rig sank, causing the 5,000 foot pipe that connected the wellhead to the drilling platform to bend. On April 24, robotic devices discovered two leaks in the bent pipe, nearly a mile below the ocean surface.
Overview


Gulf Spill Is the Largest of Its Kind, Scientists Say: The New York Times

【出展リンク】: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/03/us/03spill.html?ref=global-home


Gulf Spill Is the Largest of Its Kind, Scientists Say




NEW ORLEANS — The BP spill is by far the world’s largest accidental release of oil into marine waters, according to the most precise estimates yet of the well’s flow rate, announced by federal scientists on Monday.
Nearly five million barrels of oil have gushed from BP’s well since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded on April 20, according to the latest data. That amount outstrips the estimated 3.3 million barrels spilled into the Bay of Campeche by the Mexican rig Ixtoc I in 1979, previously believed to be the world’s largest accidental release.
The BP spill was already thought to be the largest spill in American waters, but it was unclear whether it had eclipsed Ixtoc.
“We’ve never had a spill of this magnitude in the deep ocean,” said Ian R. MacDonald, a professor of oceanography at Florida State University.
“These things reverberate through the ecosystem,” he said. “It is an ecological echo chamber, and I think we’ll be hearing the echoes of this, ecologically, for the rest of my life.”
Federal science and engineering teams, citing data that are “the most accurate to date,” estimated that 53,000 barrels of oil a day were pouring from the well just before BP was able to cap it on July 15. They also estimated that the daily flow rate had diminished over time, starting at about 62,000 barrels a day and decreasing as the reservoir of hydrocarbons feeding the gusher was gradually depleted. Before Monday’s announcement, federal scientific teams had estimated the spill in a range from 35,000 to 60,000 barrels a day.
The teams believe that the current estimates are accurate to within 10 percent. They also reported that of the roughly 4.9 million barrels that had been released from the well, about 800,000 had been captured by BP’s containment efforts. That leaves over four million barrels that gushed into the Gulf of Mexico from April 20 to July 15.
As the estimates of the number of barrels spilled increases, so, too, do the penalties under the Clean Water Act, which calls for fines of $1,100 per barrel, or $4,300 per barrel if the government finds that gross negligence led to the spill.
At 4.9 million barrels, that means that the total fine could be $5.4 billion — and, if gross negligence led to the spill, $21 billion. If BP successfully argues that the 800,000 barrels it has recovered should mitigate the penalty, then the figure drops to $4.5 billion and $17.6 billion, respectively.
The amount of oil estimated to be pouring from the well has been a matter of dispute from the earliest days of the spill. Federal and BP officials initially announced that no oil appeared to be leaking, then 1,000 barrels a day, then 5,000 a day, frequently repeating that spill estimates are rough at best and that the main goal was to stop the well. But criticism mounted that no effort was being made to measure the leak with more certainty.
The Obama administration announced the creation of a scientific group dedicated to analyzing the flow rate, which came up with a new estimate of 12,000 to 19,000 barrels a day in late May, a figure that was met with skepticism. That, too, was later revised upward several times before Monday’s announcement. Previous estimates came from analysis of videos from remote-controlled vehicles at the wellhead, modeling of the reservoir and measurements of the oil that was collected by surface ships in the response effort.
After BP capped the well, these measurements could be reinforced by pressure readings within the well. Those pressure readings were compared with pressure estimates when the well was first drilled to determine whether the rate had changed over time, which it apparently had.
The government is continuing to study the data and may refine the estimate.
Meanwhile, BP continued efforts Monday to permanently seal the well. It said it was preparing to conduct final testing on Tuesday to determine whether to go ahead with a plan to pump heavy drilling mud into the runaway Macondo well, in hopes of permanently sealing it by the end of the week.
During the tests, a surface ship will slowly inject small amounts of mud into the well to make sure the mud will reach the oil reservoir from the column of pipes and valves that sit atop it. If that is accomplished, BP will pump higher volumes of mud, and possibly cement, into the well, in an operation known as a static kill or bullheading.
BP executives said Monday that they expected positive results from the tests, which will also check the pressure of the well to ensure that it is safe to pump the mud.
The efforts come 18 days after BP placed a tight-fitting cap on the well that put a temporary end to months of leaking. Engineers had planned to begin the tests on Monday but had to delay when they found a small hydraulic leak in the capping control system above the well.
Kent Wells, senior vice president for exploration and production at BP, said on Monday that a day or two after the pumping of mud began, engineers would consider pumping cement into the well, which could permanently plug it. Engineers might also decide to wait for a relief well to be completed before pumping cement in. There is also a chance that they will pump cement during the static kill and later through the relief well, to make sure the runaway well is sealed.
“We want to end up with cement in the bottom of the hole, completely filling the entire Macondo well,” Mr. Wells said Monday. “Whether that comes from the top or whether it comes from the relief well, those will be decisions made along the way.”
An estimated 2,000 pounds of mud is to be flooded into the well this week.
Thad W. Allen, the retired Coast Guard admiral who is leading the federal response to the spill, cautioned against rushing to declare the static kill a final victory over the well. “I don’t think we can see this as the end-all, be-all, until we actually get the relief wells done,” he said.
Mr. Wells said the last 100 feet of the first of two relief wells should be completed by Aug. 15. A final killing of the well by pouring mud and cement just above the reservoir could take a few days or as much as a few weeks. If the first relief well somehow misses its target, a second one is being drilled for insurance.

Campbell Robertson reported from New Orleans, and Clifford Krauss from Houston. Catrin Einhorn and John Schwartz contributed reporting from New York.










Translate